Strategic Buyers, Horizontal Mergers and Synergies: An Experimental Investigation
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper reports an experiment designed to evaluate interrelationships between strategic buyers, market power and merger-induced synergies. The experiment consists of 40 posted-offer quadropolies. Treatments include the use of simulated or human buyers, seller consolidations and merger-induced fixed cost and unit cost synergies. In the simulated-buyer markets we observe behavior generally consistent with comparative static predictions: prices rise postmerger, and unit (but not fixed) cost synergies may exert some price-moderating effect. The addition of powerful buyers changes results markedly. Although prices are lower in the human buyer markets, outcomes are more variable and predicted comparative static effects are no longer observed. * We thank without implicating Dan Kovenock, Paul Pecorino, Charissa Wellford and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. Thanks also to Matthew Nuckols for programming assistance. Financial support from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the National Science Foundation and the Virginia Commonwealth University Faculty Excellence fund is gratefully acknowledged. The opinions in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily represent the views of the Federal Trade Commission, or any individual Commissioner. Copies of instructions, the experimental data, and some supplementary tables are available at http://www.people.vcu/~ddavis.
منابع مشابه
Equilibrium Price Dispersion, Mergers and Synergies: An Experimental Investigation of Differentiated Product Competition
This paper reports an experiment conducted to examine market performance and mergers in an asymmetric differentiated product oligopoly. We find that static Nash predictions organize mean market outcomes reasonably well. Markets on average respond to horizontal mergers with price increases as predicted and marginal cost synergies exert the predicted the power-mitigating price effects. Nash predi...
متن کاملCapturing synergies in dealmaking
Acquirers can use company-specifi c synergies as a competitive advantage, particularly when they bid against private equity fi rms. Previously, private equity fi rms outbid strategic buyers by utilizing fi nancial leverage to achieve return goals. The current economic environment doesn’t enable that strategy; private equity fi rms can only embed synergies in their bid price when they merge the ...
متن کاملHorizontal mergers with free entry
We consider the impact of horizontal mergers in the presence of free entry and exit. In contrast to much of the previous literature on horizontal mergers, our model yields predictions that seem intuitively reasonable: with only moderate cost synergies mergers of a small number of industry participants are beneficial (even under quantity competition), there is no “free rider problem” in that ins...
متن کاملA System-Optimization Perspective for Supply Chain Network Integration: The Horizontal Merger Case
In this paper, we present a new theoretical framework for the quantification of strategic advantages associated with horizontal mergers through the integration of supply chain networks. The framework is a system-optimization one in which each firm is represented as a network of economic activities associated with manufacturing, distribution, and storage and with explicit capacities imposed on t...
متن کاملCost Synergies and Post-Merger Predictions in Asymmetric Logit Environments
Using the experimental method we evaluate the Antitrust Logit Model (ALM), a merger simulation device used by U.S. antitrust authorities to help identify problematic horizontal mergers. We focus on environments with asymmetric sellers pre-merger. Our treatments include consolidations that generate merger-specific synergies, and variations in the magnitude of predicted post-merger price increase...
متن کامل